dc.contributor.author |
M. Fine |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-10-21T15:52:09Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-10-21T15:52:09Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1941 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.other |
ARC/R&M-2648 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/3189 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In R. & Ms. 2098, 2099, 2100 the stringer-sheet method of solving shear lag problems in stringer reinforced sheet was developed. The present report compares for two simple cases the solution for the plain sheet with that for the stringer-reinforced sheet. The solutions are practically identical by the two methods provided that the sheet is considered fully effective in taking end load. This leads to the conclusion that, in regions of tensile stress, at all events, all the skin area is to be included in the stringer area when applying this method. |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Aeronautical Research Council Reports & Memoranda |
en_US |
dc.title |
Comparison between plain and stringer-reinforced sheet from the shear lag standpoint |
en_US |