dc.contributor.author |
J.C. Cooke |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-10-20T11:05:37Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-10-20T11:05:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1967 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.other |
ARC/CP-1096 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/1109 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Calculations by an integral method assuming small cross-flow, and by a finite-difference method assuming the flow to be quasi-conical, are compared with measurements made available by Hummel (Technical University, Brunswick) on a highly swept delta wing at high incidence. It is found that the small-cross-flow method gives a rough general picture of the flow but is inaccurate in the details, especially velocity profiles. For this problem the quasi-conical method is more accurate over most of the flow field and gives a much better representation of the velocity profiles. |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Aeronautical Research Council Current Papers |
en_US |
dc.title |
Laminar boundary layer calculations compared with measurements by hummel |
en_US |